Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Ruling could cost indemnity insurers

Reprints

LONDON-A landmark Nov. 8 ruling in London's Court of Appeal allowing claims for pension plan misselling to be aggregated could cost professional indemnity insurers hundreds of millions of pounds.

In Lloyd's TSB General Insurance Holdings Ltd. & Others vs. Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co. Ltd. and , the Court of Appeal upheld a High Court ruling on a preliminary issue common to both actions. The court ruled that the pension company plaintiffs can each aggregate their claims for missold personal pension plans. During the late 1980s and early 1990s, thousands of workers were encouraged to buy personal pension plans and reduce reliance on state-provided pensions.

Lloyds Bank and Abbey National argued that the pension misselling claims are the result of a related series of acts and omissions and can be aggregated. The insurers argued that the pensions were sold by different agents and should be treated as individual claims. The pension companies' insurance policies have a deductible of £1 million ($1.5 million) for each loss. Claims received by the two companies total more than £100 million.

The Financial Services Authority estimates that the total bill for personal pensions wrongly sold to members of employer-sponsored plans in the wake of the Financial Services Act 1986 could reach £13.5 billion ($19.73 billion) but an FSA spokeswoman could not estimate how much of that total would be covered by insurance.

However, lawyers estimate that insurance claims totaling several hundreds of millions of pounds are awaiting the outcome of these cases. The Court of Appeal refused the insurers leave to appeal the case to the House of Lords.