Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Aon, RPX Insurance offer insurance policy to manage, mitigate 'patent trolls'

Reprints

A new non-practicing entity patent insurance policy that is designed to manage and mitigate the growing issue of “patent trolls” — firms that are created for the sole purpose of suing companies over their patents — will offer up to $2.5 million in coverage, Aon Risk Solutions said Tuesday.

The policy is underwritten by RPX Insurance Services Inc., a unit of San Francisco-based RPX Corp., a patent consulting firm, which developed the product with Aon Risk Solutions, a unit of London-based Aon P.L.C. Aon Risk Solutions will exclusively distribute the insurance, which is designed for firms with $1 billion or less in revenue, said Shawn Ram, San Jose, Calif.-based managing director and technology practice leader for Aon Risk Solutions.

Non-practicing entities are considered a problem in the patent arena. According to RPX, the number of patent infringement lawsuits filed by non-practicing entities nearly tripled in size to more than 1,300 in 2011 from about 500 in 2005.

The total cost for NPE litigation in 2011 was $29 billion, reflecting a more than 400% increase from 2005, according to a study by James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer of the Boston University School of Law, which is cited in Aon's announcement about the product.

The study said 82% of the defendants sued by non-practicing entities had less than $100 million in revenues. “Much of the litigation appears to consist of nuisance suits that settle for a few hundred thousand dollars. But some (non-practicing entities) are 'big game hunters' who seek and get settlements in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars,” said the study, which was released in June.

%%BREAK%%

Mr. Ram said that until now, insurers “have struggled to develop a viable product around patent trolls.” RPX, however, has a “tremendous amount of data” that has been leveraged “to build a product that is viable and actually makes sense.”

Mr. Ram said deductibles will vary and, while $2.5 million in coverage is available initially, there are “clearly opportunities to increase limits.”

RPX CEO John A. Amster said in a statement, “Our ability to collect, aggregate and analyze large amounts of often-proprietary patent market data, coupled with our core defensive patent acquisition service, allows us to provide a comprehensive risk reduction offering that meets the needs of smaller companies.”

“There's tremendous interest. We're not having problems getting meetings,” Mr. Ram said. “This is a risk area that is rampant, and is causing a lot of problems for companies, and so people are looking for solutions around this risk.”