Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

U.S. Supreme Court narrows scope of whistle-blower suits

Reprints

WASHINGTON (Reuters)—Corporate whistle-blowers suffered a setback Monday as a divided U.S. Supreme Court said they cannot bring lawsuits on the basis of information learned through Freedom of Information Act requests.

By a 5-3 vote, the court reversed a federal appeals court ruling in favor of a former Schindler Elevator Corp. employee who sued the company under the federal False Claims Act.

The employee, Daniel Kirk, said the company did not comply with reporting requirements concerning the employment of Vietnam veterans. The lawsuit was based on information his wife obtained through FOIA requests.

A federal judge threw out his lawsuit, saying a response to a FOIA request constitutes a “report” and thus falls within a bar on False Claims Act lawsuits based on public information disclosed in that manner.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York reversed that decision last year, but the U.S. Supreme Court found Monday that the lower court judge was correct.

Mr. Kirk's lawyer was not immediately available for comment.

Read Next

  • SEC cool to corporate demands on whistleblowers

    WASHINGTON (Reuters)—U.S. securities regulators are resisting corporate America's demands to force whistleblowers to report possible wrongdoing internally before they can be considered for compensation from regulators.