Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Watchdog warns EU countries over post-Brexit shell companies

Reprints
Watchdog warns EU countries over post-Brexit shell companies

(Reuters) — Europe’s insurance watchdog warned national regulators on Tuesday not to undercut one another in their attempts to attract firms moving from London because of Britain’s exit from the European Union.

London-based financial services firms have been making plans to set up operations in the EU to maintain access to its single market after Brexit and there is fierce competition among major European cities to attract them.

As a result, the EU regulator is concerned about the risks of shell companies springing up in the EU that delegate key operations to parents in London.

It has said that any countries offering such flexible solutions to attract business could undermine stability.

Any regulatory leeway at the national level “is not a means for lowering standards or for disregarding prudential requirements,” the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority said.

“Sound supervision demands appropriate location of management and key functions,” EIOPA Chairman Gabriel Bernardino wrote in a statement accompanying a seven-page guidance document. “Empty shells or letter boxes are not acceptable.”

EIOPA said regulators should ensure that firms setting up shop in the European Union should exhibit “an appropriate level of corporate substance, proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of the planned business.”

This includes a reasonable level of local staff, it said.

Regulators must also allow sufficient time for the application process and not take shortcuts. EIOPA warned against an automatic recognition of a firm because it was granted by another supervisor in another member state.

It also said that companies moving into the EU might be tempted to try to limit the effect of relocation by outsourcing functions and activities.

The watchdog said that such outsourcing must not “deplete the corporate substance of the EU entities with repercussions on the adequacy of their management and on the effectiveness of supervision by the EU27 supervisors.”