Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

GOP lawmakers urge swift movement on federal terrorism insurance backstop

Reprints
GOP lawmakers urge swift movement on federal terrorism insurance backstop

A group of more than 40 Republican members of the House of Representatives are urging swift, long-term reauthorization of the federal government's terrorism insurance backstop program.

In a Dec. 1 letter to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., the representatives said the fact that the program, slated to expire Dec. 31, has not yet been reauthorized is “already hurting the economy.”

Businesses that currently carry terrorism coverage are being told their coverage will end absent congressional action, which is “causing the sort of uncertainty that hurts economic growth,” according to the letter's signatories.

The writers, led by Stephen Fincher, R-Tenn., say that a short-term extension of the program would only prolong the problem. “The time is now to act on a multiyear reauthorization” of the program, they added.

The full Senate has passed the measure that would extend the program for seven years. The House Financial Services Committee approved a different bill that would extend the program for five years, but the full House has yet to act on either measure.

The program will expire unless it is reauthorized during the current lame-duck session, which is expected to last until next week.

Read Next

  • Possible sunset of federal terrorism coverage backstop concerns insurers

    CHICAGO — The federal terrorism insurance backstop set to expire at the end of this year likely will be replaced or extended, but insurers are worried about workers compensation exposures that could stem from a terrorism event if the backstop goes away, a panel of insurance industry experts said Tuesday.