BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

US can’t sue state over nuclear presumption law: Federal judge


The U.S. government has no legal recourse over the state of Washington’s one-year-old law that provides workers compensation benefits for workers suffering from ailments stemming from employment on the 75-year-old decommissioned nuclear site in Hanford, Washington, a federal judge ruled on Thursday.

The U.S. Department of Justice filed its suit in December 2018 over the state’s presumption law, claiming that the law discriminates against the federal government and its Energy Department contractors and aims to directly regulate the federal government by imposing extra cleanup costs of the decommissioned site, according to documents in United States of America v. State of Washington, et al., filed in the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Washington in Yakima, Washington.

The law, which Gov. Jay Inslee signed in early 2018, addressed illnesses and cancers suffered by workers on the 560-square-mile federally operated site known for having manufactured the plutonium used in one of the atomic bombs dropped on Japan in 1945.

A judge with the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Washington granted a summary judgment Thursday “because Congress has authorized several states to regulate workers compensation on federal land to the same extent that they can regulate non-federal land, and because Washington could create a similar presumption as that created in (the new law) if it were addressing a particular risk to Washington employees on non-federal land.”








Read Next