BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
Axa S.A.’s $15.3 billion bid to buy Bermuda-based XL Group Ltd. has some observers questioning the logic and pricing of the deal.
The Paris-based insurer’s stock took a header after the deal was announced Monday, dropping just under 10% for the day.
“They really did get hit quite a bit on the share price drop,” said Brian Schneider, Chicago-based senior director for Fitch Ratings Inc. “So the market doesn’t seem to like it.”
Investors appeared to balk at the sudden shift in course, according to a research note Tuesday from Jeffries International Ltd.
“Axa’s sharp fall yesterday suggests high level investor angst at the unexpected acceleration in corporate and strategic actions to reposition the group towards more underwriting risk,” the Jeffries note said.
S&P Global Ratings Inc. on Tuesday placed Axa’s insurer financial strength ratings on review with negative implications. The New York based ratings agency said “the acquisition carries material execution risk,” and “the transaction, if completed, could materially weaken AXA’s capital adequacy.”
Axa said buying XL would result in property/casualty insurance rising to half of its earnings from its current level of 39%.
Pricing also came under scrutiny.
The $57.60/share bid from Axa, Europe’s second-biggest insurer, represents a 33% premium to XL’s closing stock price on the preceding Friday.
“I guess it was on the high side, but we have seen similar prices paid,” said Mr. Schneider. “For example, the price AIG paid for Validus I thought was on the high side as well.”
Still, at 1.5 times book value, current valuations are not as high as some of the values that were seen when some Asian buyers were willing to pay two times book value for some properties, Mr. Schneider said.
“In this case, they’re looking to get that bigger footprint and larger, stronger multiline type of company, and there are not that many ways they could get that done,” Mr. Schneider said. “In terms of trying to make a big hit in the near-term, they had to buy something big, and there’s not that many large properties available. Given that, it required them to pay this type of a premium.”
Macquarie Capital Ltd. in a research note Tuesday upgraded Axa’s stock to neutral from underperform while remaining skeptical.
“While the logic for the transaction seems less than compelling in our view and we expect the core business growth is weaker than many believe, if the business pays down the leverage and the XL combined ratio recovers, then the stock should recover,” the Macquarie note said.
Reports after the deal was announced Monday also had analysts questioning the price as well as the logic of the deal.
Still, Macquarie suggested the shift to commercial risks could help facilitate growth.
“Given the large ticket size, we expect growth in large commercial risks is easier, as these are broker-driven markets with regular reviews,” Macquarie said in its note.
And there was one notable winner in the deal.
“For XL, I think it’s a good deal from a shareholder standpoint,” Mr. Schneider said.
(Reuters) — French insurer Axa S.A. posted higher-than-expected 2017 net profits and stronger earnings in the United States ahead of the planned flotation of its American life insurance and asset management businesses in the second quarter this year.