BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
A tool and die manufacturer that lost $800,000 when it fell victim to “spoofing” emails cannot recover under the computer fraud provision of its insurance policy because it was not a “direct” loss “directly caused” by the use of any computer, says a federal court ruling.
On March 18, 2015, the vice president of Grass Lake Michigan-based American Tooling Center Inc. sent an email to one of the company’s vendors requesting copies of all outstanding invoices, according to Tuesday’s ruling by the U.S. District Court in Ann Arbor, Michigan, in American Tooling Center Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America.
The vice president received emails purportedly from the vendor instructing ATC to send payment for several legitimate outstanding invoices to a new bank account, according to the ruling.
Without verifying the new banking instructions, ATC wire-transferred about $800,000 to a bank account that was not, in fact, controlled by the vendor.
But by the time the fraud was detected, the funds had been transferred, and the wire transfers could not be retracted. ATC eventually paid the vendor about $400,000, according to the ruling.
ATC filed a claim with its insurer, Hartford-based Travelers, which denied coverage on the basis the loss was not a “direct loss” that was “directly caused by the use of a computer” as required by the policy.
ATC filed suit seeking coverage. The District Court agreed with the insurer. Intervening events “between ATC’s receipt of the fraudulent emails and the transfer of funds (ATC verified production milestones, authorized its transfers and initiated the transfers without verifying bank account information) preclude a finding of ‘direct’ loss ‘directly caused’ by the use of any computer,” said the ruling.
“There was no infiltration or ‘hacking’ of ATC’s computer system,” said the ruling, also. “The emails themselves did not directly cause the transfer of funds; rather, ATC authorized the transfer based upon the information received in the emails,” said the ruling, in granting Travelers summary judgment dismissing the case.
(Reuters) — The bosses of Wall Street banks Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. are the latest executives to fall victim to an email prankster who has also managed to connect with the head of Barclays P.L.C. and the governor of the Bank of England.