BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
NEW ORLEANS—A climate change lawsuit thought dead after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of its dismissal on procedural grounds is being resurrected.
In Ned Comer et al. vs. Murphy Oil USA et al., a group of Mississippi property owners alleged that greenhouse gas emissions by Murphy Oil USA—through more than 100 oil, coal and chemical companies—contributed to climate change and exacerbated property damage Hurricane Katrina caused in 2005.
The plaintiffs sought damages under Mississippi common law, but a federal judge dismissed the case, saying it posed a political question that could not be decided by the courts.
A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling in October 2009. The defendants sought an en banc hearing by the full court, which was granted. But when eight of the court's 16 standing judges recused themselves due to conflicts of interest, the court voted 5-3 last summer to dismiss the appeal, letting the district court's dismissal stand.
The plaintiffs appealed that dismissal this month, arguing that the three-judge panel's decision should stand.
RICHMOND, Va.—The Virginia Supreme Court last week affirmed its ruling that Steadfast Insurance Co. has no obligation to defend or indemnify Arlington, Va.-based AES Corp. in a climate change liability suit.