BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

U.S. judge sides with Netflix in antitrust lawsuit


OAKLAND, Calif. (Reuters)—A U.S. judge granted Netflix Inc.'s bid to resolve all claims in its favor before trial in an antitrust class action, in which plaintiffs had sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.

Netflix was sued in 2009, with plaintiffs claiming that the online DVD company reached an agreement with Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to divide the market for sales and on-line rentals of DVDs in the United States.

The class of plaintiffs had already agreed to settle with Wal-Mart for $27.3 million in 2010. Preliminary approval to the settlement agreement has been granted, with the final approval hearing scheduled for 2012.

Yet in anticipation of an upcoming trial against Netflix, plaintiffs pegged their damages between roughly $493 million and $654 million, according to court filings.

In a ruling Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Phyllis Hamilton granted Netflix's motion for summary judgment and vacated the trial date.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A Netflix representative could not immediately be reached.