Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

P/C insurer groups unite in opposing federal capital aid

AIA, NAMIC and PCI say primary coverage providers are sufficiently capitalized and reserved to pay their claims

Reprints

WASHINGTON--The three major primary property/casualty insurer trade groups may not agree on everything, but they are united in their belief that P/C insurers should not participate in the federal government's capital purchase program.

The program, which is part of the federal government's $700 billion financial market bailout package, is designed to pump capital into banks and other financial institutions.

However, all three major trade groups that represent primary property/casualty insurers issued statements last week urging their members to forgo tapping the fund.

Evan Greenberg, chairman of the Washington-based American Insurance Assn., issued a statement saying the majority of AIA members don't support inclusion of P/C insurers in the program. If the program became available to them, they would not participate, he said.

"Those members believe that...they are well-capitalized and well-positioned to weather the current financial market crisis without the assistance of the CPP," said Mr. Greenberg, who also is chairman and chief executive officer of Switzerland-based ACE Ltd.

The National Assn. of Mutual Insurance Cos. also stated its opposition to expanding the program to include P/C insurers.

"As an industry, property/casualty insurance companies, particularly the nation's mutual insurance companies, are well-capitalized and have adequate reserves to pay claims," Charles Chamness, president and CEO of Indianapolis-based NAMIC, said in a statement.

NAMIC's policy "is to oppose the expansion of Treasury's capital purchase program to include the property/casualty insurance industry," Mr. Chamness said.

The Property Casualty Insurers Assn. of America also spoke on the issue last week.

In a statement, PCI's board of directors said its position is "that the industry is generally well-capitalized and managed and is continuing to provide sound and secure products to consumers.

"PCI believes that property/casualty insurer participation in a Treasury relief program is neither necessary nor in the best interest of property/casualty consumers," the Des Plaines, Ill.-based association said in its statement.