BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
TO THE EDITOR: Reading the May 7 Business Insurance editorial, plus reports from the recent New Orleans RIMS conference, I can only conclude that the three monkeys display an egregious form of obdurate obstinacy. For more than 40 years, insurance sellers, intermediaries and buyers have remained in self-denial about the inefficiencies and gross conflicts of interest they have allowed to continue. Every year, they insist on seeing, hearing and speaking "no evil."
First, your editorial challenges "risk managers" to "speak up to be heard." Is it possible this group is congenitally incapable of speaking up?
Second, a few outspoken souls during RIMS raised the issue of broker compensation, only to hear platitudes about "disclosure" and "transparency." No one suggested that all commissions are blatant conflicts of interest. Shouldn't a broker receive all its income from the client?
Third, I can't believe I'm still hearing about brokers generating investment income on premiums held before remitting them. Where is the buyers' backbone? Simply make out the premium checks to the insurers, not the intermediaries.
I'm frustrated, because many of us have criticized this conflict-ridden and inefficient system for more than 40 years. In a 1971 speech to the San Francisco RIMS Chapter, I suggested 10 steps to change the system. Here are four relating to the discussions in New Orleans:
c Substitute fees for commissions.
c Insist on direct meetings with underwriters.
c Pay insurance companies directly.
c Eliminate contingency commissions.
Thirty-six years after these words were written, the system remains locked in inefficiency and conflict of interest.
Business Insurance welcomes letters to the editor. The section is intended to be a forum for readers' opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit letters for clarity or space. We will not publish unsigned letters. Please send your letters to: Letters to the Editor, Business Insurance, 360 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, Ill. 60601-3806; fax: 312-280-3174; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org