Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Former UP contraceptive policy not biased: Court

Reprints

OMAHA, Neb.--Union Pacific Railroad's former policy of not paying for contraceptives was not discriminatory against women and therefore did not violate the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, a panel of judges with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.

Thursday's 2-to-1 ruling found that the policy was nondiscriminatory because Omaha, Neb.-based Union Pacific Railroad did not pay for male contraception either, according to court documents. The court decision reverses a federal judge's 2005 opinion.

The original suit was filed in 2003 in the U.S. District Court in Oregon by three female Union Pacific employees who alleged the company's policy violated the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, as part of the federal Civil Rights Act.

Following the 2003 filing, the company and its union agreed to begin covering contraceptives as part of the health plan, a spokesman said Friday.