BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
Main points in the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Philip Morris USA vs. Mayola Williams:
1. Whether in reviewing a jury's award of punitive damages, an appellate court's conclusion that a defendant's conduct was highly reprehensible and analogous to a crime can "override" the constitutional requirement that punitive damages be reasonably related to the plaintiffs harm.
2. Whether due process permits a jury to punish a defendant for the effects of its conduct on nonparties to a lawsuit.
The Supreme Court held that a jury can take into account actual harm to nonparties when determining the reprehensibility of a defendant's conduct, but it cannot go further and use punitive damages to punish the defendant for harm caused to nonparties. The court did not decide whether punitive damages levied against Philip Morris were excessive, and sent the case back to the Oregon Supreme Court for further consideration.
Source: U.S. Supreme Court