Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Air France crash investigation focuses on pilot role

Reprints

PARIS (Reuters)—A French airliner plunged out of control for more than four minutes before crashing into the Atlantic in 2009, investigators said, in a report raising questions about how crew handled a "stall alarm" sounding in the cabin.

French investigators, in an initial report on data recorders hauled up from the Atlantic floor this month, said the emergency began with an audible stall warning two and a half hours into the Air France flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris.

The Airbus A330 jet climbed to 38,000 feet and then began a dramatic three and a half minute descent, rolling from left to right, with the youngest of three pilots handing control to the second most senior pilot one minute before the crash.

The captain had left the cabin nine minutes earlier on a routine rest break.

France's BEA crash investigation authority said it was too early to give the causes of the crash ahead of a fuller report in the summer.

In a passage likely to attract scrutiny, the BEA said the pilot pulled the nose up at crucial moments as the aircraft became unstable.

"The inputs made by the pilot flying were mainly nose-up," the BEA said in a timeline based on initial examination of the cockpit voice and data recorders.

The BEA declined to say whether this was the correct action to take and the information given so far does not give a complete picture of the data displayed to the crew.

A top aircraft industry safety consultant said the standard guidance in the Airbus pilot manual called for the pilot to push the control stick forward to force the plane's nose down in the event of a stall, which can lead to a loss of control.

"The BEA is now going to have to analyse and get to bottom of how crew handled this event," said Paul Hayes, safety director at Ascend Aviation, a U.K.-based aviation consultancy.

"The big question in my mind is why did the pilot flying (the aircraft) appear to continue to pull the nose up," he said.

Black box

The crew's response contrasts with the latest advice to pilots contained in an Airbus training seminar in October last year, according to a document obtained by Reuters.

In large red capital letters, the document says that in the event of a stall warning, pilots should "APPLY NOSE DOWN PITCH CONTROL TO REDUCE AOA (ANGLE OF ATTACK)."

Two aviation industry sources said the drill in force at the time of the accident was to apply full thrust and reduce the pitch attitude of the aircraft, which means lowering the nose.

Later guidance calls for pilots to push the nose down and adjust thrust as necessary, they said, asking not to be named.

An aerodynamic stall is a loss of lift due to a high angle of attack, or angle between the plane and airflow. Pushing the control stick forward and lowering the nose adjusts for this.

It does not refer to a stall of the engines, which the BEA said had operated and responded throughout to crew actions.

The captain returned after "several attempts" to call him back to the cockpit but was not at the controls in the final moments, according to information gleaned from black boxes.

By the time the 58-year-old returned, just over a minute into the emergency, the aircraft was plunging at 10,000 feet a minute with its nose pointing up 15 degrees and at too high an angle compared to the onrushing air to provide lift.

The BEA said the reading of the black boxes suggested the crew were not able to determine how fast the plane was flying.

That echoes earlier findings which suggest the pitot tubes or speed sensors on the plane may have become iced up.

"These are so far just observations, not an understanding of the events," BEA director Jean-Paul Troadec told reporters.

Relatives of victims had waited long for the report.

"It's very emotional to see the unrolling minute by minute or second by second at some points of what happened," said John Clemes, vp of the families' support group.

"You automatically think of your family member and how they were living through this. It's the events that caused the deaths of 228 people so it's traumatic and moving.

The BEA report was strictly factual and did not allocate any blame or cause of the crash on June 1, 2009.

"These are so far just observations, not an understanding of the events," BEA director Jean-Paul Troadec told reporters.

The BEA dampened speculation that the jet may have been engulfed by a freak equatorial storm.

Pilots had decided without apparent stress to alter course slightly to avoid turbulence shortly before the emergency. But the junior pilot told flight attendants to prepare for a "little bit of turbulence."

"In two minutes we should enter an area where it'll move about more than at the moment; you should watch out," he told cabin staff. "I'll call you back as soon as we're out of it."

Read Next