Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Madoff investors' lawsuit against SEC thrown out

Reprints

NEW YORK (Reuters)—A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by two of Bernard Madoff's former customers accusing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of negligence for failing to uncover the now-imprisoned swindler's Ponzi scheme.

U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain in Manhattan said the plaintiffs, Phyllis Molchatsky and Dr. Steven Schneider, failed to show that the SEC violated any statute or rule governing how it should have investigated Mr. Madoff prior to his December 2008 arrest.

"Scandalous and outrageous as plaintiffs' allegations are, plaintiffs fail to identify any specific, mandatory duty that the SEC violated in its numerous instances of sloppy, uninformed, irresponsible behavior," the judge wrote.

Ms. Molchatsky and Dr. Schneider had sued the SEC under the Federal Tort Claims Act in October 2009, after the regulator rejected their claims. The government countered that it was up to the SEC to decide whom and how to investigate.

Howard Elisofon, a partner at Herrick Feinstein L.L.P., said the plaintiffs are reviewing their next step.

"We are disappointed with the judge's opinion and continue to believe that the court is well-suited to oversee the SEC's actions and inactions, which were inarguably negligent," he said. "In our professional view, that's what the Federal Tort Claims Act not only enables, but actually mandates."

SEC spokeswoman Florence Harmon declined to comment. Other investors have also sued the SEC, and Judge Swain's ruling could affect how those cases are decided.

According to court papers, Ms. Molchatsky is a disabled retiree who lost $1.7 million after investing her life savings in a "feeder fund" that funneled money to Mr. Madoff, while Dr. Schneider lost about $750,000 with Mr. Madoff.

Botched probes

In September 2009, SEC Inspector General David Kotz issued a report faulting the regulator for repeatedly mishandling warnings about Mr. Madoff, once dismissing whistleblower Harry Markopolos as a "self-identified independent fraud analyst" whose warnings on Mr. Madoff constituted a "fishing expedition."

Mr. Kotz said this caused the SEC to botch five probes starting in the early 1990s that might have unearthed Mr. Madoff's fraud.

Mary Schapiro, the current SEC chairman, has implemented reforms designed to avoid a repeat.

Mr. Madoff, 72, pleaded guilty in March 2009 to running what prosecutors called a $65 billion Ponzi scheme. He is serving a 150-year sentence in a North Carolina federal prison.

Irving Picard, a court-appointed trustee seeking money for former Madoff investors, has filed more than 1,000 lawsuits to recover roughly $100 billion, including from Mr. Madoff's main bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co. He has recovered about $10 billion so far.

The case is Molchatsky et al. vs. United States of America, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 09-08697.

Read Next

  • Top JPMorgan execs were warned about Madoff: Trustee

    NEW YORK (Reuters)—JPMorgan Chase & Co. executives were concerned that Bernard Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme, but they silently stood by for years to protect the bank's investments, the trustee for Madoff's investors said.