DOL sues Texas dental practice for employee retaliation
Reprints
The U.S. Department of Labor announced Thursday that it has filed a lawsuit against two North Texas dentists on behalf of a dental hygienist and a dental assistant who were not reinstated after expressing concerns about what COVID-19 safety measures would be in place when the practice reopened in spring 2020.
The DOL said in March and April 2020, Roger Bohannan and David Bohannan, owners of Roger H. Bohannan DDS Inc. in North Richland Hills, Texas, furloughed their employees after the state prohibited specific dental procedures at the height of the pandemic.
While furloughed, the two employees asked what safety measures would be in place once patients and employees returned. After receiving a call to return to work, the employer did not reinstate the hygienist after they cited guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, according to the DOL.
An OSHA investigation found Bohannan Dentistry discriminated against the employees for exercising their rights to question safety protocols, as the two employees were not rehired while all of the other staff members at the practice were reinstated when the furlough ended, according to the DOL.
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, the suit is asking the court to order the employer to pay the complainant damages, plus interest, for all past and future lost wages and benefits resulting from the termination; reimbursement for costs and expenses; compensatory damages, including for compensation for emotional pain and distress and exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
The dental office did not immediately respond to questions for comment.
Read Next
-
Dental assistant’s necessary medical care required: Appeals court
A divisive Florida appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a workers compensation insurer and employer must pay for the continuing care of a dental assistant who was injured while preventing a patient from falling in 2017 — a worker who had a previous medical condition related to a car accident.
Related Stories
Most Read in Workers Comp
-
1. Zurich ordered to pay $80 million in suit over employee incentives
-
3. Marsh McLennan sees rate hikes slowing; reports revenue growth
-
4. Travelers sees rate hikes continue; Q1 profit up over 15%
-
5. DeSantis signs legislation prohibiting local workplace heat protections
-
6. AI not a ‘substitute,’ but can benefit insurance industry: Experts
