BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
(Reuters) — Kmart Corp. has paid $1.4 million to settle allegations that it violated the federal False Claims Act by inducing Medicare beneficiaries to fill prescriptions at its pharmacies, the U.S. Department of Justice said Tuesday.
The government said the accord resolves allegations that Kmart, a unit of Sears Holdings Corp., let beneficiaries use drug manufacturers' coupons to reduce or eliminate prescription copayments.
It said this caused people to seek out brand-name drugs rather than cheaper generics, boosting the government's costs.
Kmart was also accused of improperly offering discounts on gasoline purchases at participating gas stations based on the number of prescriptions filled.
The government said Kmart's improper activity lasted from June 2011 to June 2014, and violated a federal prohibition against offering benefits to Medicare beneficiaries to influence their decisions about which pharmacies to use.
Tuesday's settlement resolved claims first brought in a 2013 whistleblower lawsuit by Joshua Leighr, a former Kmart pharmacist from Kansas City, Missouri. He will receive about $248,500 of the payout, the Justice Department said.
Kmart has about 780 in-store pharmacies, and settled without any determination of liability, the Justice Department said
Howard Riefs, a Sears spokesman, declined to comment. The company is based in Hoffman Estates, Illinois.
The case is U.S. ex rel. Leighr v. Sears Holdings Corp. et al., U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri, No. 13-00988.
A whistleblower does not need to play a role in the public disclosure of a wrongdoing, a federal appeals court has ruled, reversing a lower court ruling that dismissed a case on the grounds that the whistleblowers were not involved in their claim becoming public.