BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
Corrected: An earlier version of this story incorrectly referred to the D.C. Court of Appeals as a federal court.
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals on Thursday ruled against policyholders trying to recover COVID-19-related business interruption losses.
A group of restaurants and bars had filed suit against the Erie Insurance Exchange, a unit of the Erie, Pennsylvania-based Erie Insurance Group, seeking coverage under their Erie Ultrapack Plus Policy insurance package, according to the ruling in Rose’s 1, LLC et al., v. Erie Insurance Exchange.
A three-judge panel affirmed a ruling by the Washington, D.C., Superior Court in denying the plaintiffs coverage. “Like other courts, we are tasked with determining whether appellants have alleged a ‘direct physical loss of or damage to Covered Property. We determine they have not,” the ruling said.
“Taking the Policy at face value...we conclude that the loss of covered property must be tangible and material. It must be perceptible, a physical alteration or change,” it said, citing earlier rulings.
“Appellants have not alleged a tangible change or alteration to their properties, and thus, they have not shown ‘physical loss of or damage to Covered Property’ as required by the Policy,” it said in affirming the lower court.