BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
Some 69% of the global rating actions on insurers driven by environmental, social and governance factors were negative from April 2020 to March 2021, A.M. Best Co. Inc. said in a report Wednesday.
Weather-related events and governance were the most common drivers of negative ESG rating actions, followed by reputational risk, the Oldwick, New Jersey-based ratings agency said.
Where weather was the driver, this was due primarily to companies experiencing weather-related losses that were beyond their expectations, Best said.
“This was particularly true for small monoline insurers with geographical concentrations, such as companies exposed to floods or wildfire risk in a single U.S. state,” Best said.
Inadequate protection against weather-related losses could lead to the deterioration of the balance sheet or operating performance, Best said.
“Conversely, companies that exceed expectations and improve their operations – through strengthened governance practices, for example—may experience positive rating actions,” according to the report.
ESG was a key factor in just 13% of Best’s total global rating actions on insurers in the time period, the report said. Of those, 31% were positive.
Property-casualty insurers accounted for 85% of rating actions driven by ESG factors, and life/health insurers for 15%.
Of the rating actions driven by ESG factors during the period, some 72% were on companies domiciled in the U.S. because they account for the majority of Best’s rating population.
(Reuters) — Investor groups have asked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for more corporate disclosures on climate change and other environmental, social and governance issues while business interests have pushed back, a Reuters review of correspondence published by the regulator shows.