Printed from BusinessInsurance.com

S&P analyst, 2 others charged with insider trading in paint merger

Posted On: Jun. 26, 2018 1:58 PM CST

S&P analyst, 2 others charged with insider trading in paint merger

(Reuters) — The U.S. government on Tuesday criminally charged a Standard & Poor’s credit ratings analyst and two friends, all from Manhattan, with insider trading related to Sherwin-Williams Co.’s $9.3 billion purchase of Valspar Corp.

According to prosecutors, S&P analyst Sebastian Pinto-Thomaz, 32, tipped Abell Oujaddou and Jeremy Millul in early March 2016 about the impending transaction between the two paint makers, after learning about it in confidential memos at work.

Mr. Oujaddou, 55, who runs an upscale Manhattan hair salon, and Mr. Millul, 31, who manages a jewelry boutique in Manhattan’s Diamond District, allegedly made about $300,000 of illegal profit by buying Valspar shares and options, and selling them after the merger was announced on March 20, 2016.

Prosecutors also said that after the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority began examining trades in Valspar that occurred before the announcement, Mr. Pinto-Thomaz lied to S&P by denying he knew Messrs. Oujaddou and Millul.

Sherwin-Williams agreed to buy Minneapolis-based Valspar for $113 per share, 35% above where it traded before the all-cash merger was announced. Valspar shares rose about 23% on the next trading day.

Lawyers for the defendants could not immediately be reached for comment. S&P, part of S&P Global Inc., did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

All three defendants were arrested on Tuesday and charged with securities fraud and conspiracy. Each faces up to 20 years in prison on the securities fraud counts.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed related civil charges against the defendants.

Sherwin-Williams is based in Cleveland. It closed the Valspar transaction on June 1, 2017, after divesting $431 million of assets.

The cases are U.S. v. Pinto-Thomaz et al., U.S. .District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 18-mag-05432; and SEC v. Pinto-Thomaz et al. in the same court, No. 18-05757.