Login Register Subscribe
Current Issue


BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

District court's dismissal of neck injury claim affirmed


The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday affirmed the district court's dismissal of a case against Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America.

David Clark argued that Indemnity Insurance and Gallagher Bassett Services Inc. acted in bad faith by denying his January claim for a neck injury without reviewing his medical records instead of a summary. The appeals court in San Francisco, California, ruled to affirm the district court’s dismissal of this part of Mr. Clark’s claim, stating that he did not explain how examination of his medical records, rather than a summary, might have revealed facts supporting coverage for his injury, according to court records.

The court also agreed with Indemnity Insurance’s reasoning in rejecting Mr. Clark’s claim, stating that the injury was raised more than a month after it was sustained, Mr. Clark informed the hospital where the fusion surgery was performed that his injury was not suffered during his employment, and Mr. Clark used his own group health insurance policy, according to court records.

“The Employer’s Report of Industrial Injury, which stated that (Mr.) Clark sustained a ‘blown disk in unknown area of back due to unknown cause,’ did not clarify matters. On the basis of what was known at that time, and with a statutory deadline looming, Indemnity's denial of (Mr.) Clark’s January claim could not have been unreasonable,” according to records.