Login Register Subscribe
Current Issue


BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Court clears Icahn's CVR to sue law firm for malpractice


(Reuters) — A New York state appeals court on Thursday cleared the way for billionaire investor Carl Icahn to pursue an unusual malpractice lawsuit against the powerful law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz over his 2012 hostile takeover of CVR Energy Inc.

The 5-0 decision by the Appellate Division in Manhattan frees CVR to contest whether Wachtell should have revealed how Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Deutsche Bank A.G., which were helping it defend against Mr. Icahn's tender offer, stood to earn far higher fees if the takeover bid actually succeeded.

In effect, CVR, and thus Mr. Icahn, claimed to have overpaid for the process that left the activist investor with a now 82% stake in the Sugar Land, Texas-based petroleum refiner and nitrogen fertilizer manufacturer.

The tender offer had valued CVR at about $2.6 billion at the time. Mr. Icahn is now worth $15.6 billion, Forbes magazine said.

Wachtell did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In dismissing the malpractice claim, Justice O. Peter Sherwood of the New York Supreme Court in Manhattan affirmed in February 2015 that CVR was contractually bound to pay the banks more than $36 million because it failed to object fast enough.

U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in Manhattan dismissed a similar federal case in March of this year, saying he was bound by Justice Sherwood's ruling on the case's merits.

But the appeals court said Justice Sherwood's ruling did not bar CVR from pursuing a malpractice claim for "conduct that allegedly caused and/or contributed" to CVR's acceptance of the contracts, and its inability to extricate itself from them.

Herbert Beigel, a lawyer for CVR and Mr. Icahn, said Thursday's decision means Judge Sullivan is no longer bound by Justice Sherwood's ruling.

"CVR is gratified by the court's decision," Mr. Beigel said in a phone interview. "We expect our federal case on the malpractice claim to proceed."

Goldman and Deutsche Bank had separately sued CVR to recoup unpaid fees. That litigation was settled last October.

The case is Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz et al. v. CVR Energy Inc. et al., New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 1st Department, No. 654343/2013.