Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Pennsylvania Senate rejects pension reform bill

Reprints

The Pennsylvania Senate on June 23 rejected a state House bill that would have created a hybrid retirement plan for new employees participating in the state employees and teachers defined benefit plans.

The Senate voted 31-19 in favor of a “motion to non-concur,” or to reject, the reform bill that was approved by the state House on June 13.

House Bill 1499 would have established a mandatory 401(k)-type defined contribution plan for future employees. The first $50,000 of the employee's salary would be covered by the traditional defined benefit plan. Any amount of salary above the cap would be covered through the DC component.

The bill would have covered new employees in the $48.5 billion Public School Employees' Retirement System and the $26 billion State Employees' Retirement System, both in Harrisburg. The two plans have more than $56 billion in unfunded liabilities.

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf had endorsed the bill.

Rick Baert writes for Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Business Insurance.

Read Next

  • Reinsurers getting a taste of pension plan de-risking

    As companies that offer pension plans continue to explore buyout deals to reduce their liabilities, reinsurers increasingly are attracted to underwriting the longevity risk taken on by insurers in such deals to hedge the mortality risk on their books.