E.U. hits Google with second antitrust chargeReprints
(Reuters) — The European Union charged Google Inc. on Wednesday with using its dominant Android mobile operating system to squeeze out rivals, opening a second front against the U.S. technology giant that could result in large fines.
E.U. antitrust regulators said that by requiring mobile phone manufacturers to pre-install Google Search and the Google Chrome browser to get access to other Google apps, the U.S. company was harming consumers by stifling competition.
The European Commission said such practices, which started in 2011 when the company became dominant in mobile operating systems and app stores, showed Google was seeking to shield its search engine, the world's most popular, from competition.
Google is already facing E.U. charges over the promotion of its shopping service in Internet searches at the expense of rival services in a case that has dragged on since late 2010 despite three attempts to resolve the issues.
The stakes are higher for Google in the Android case as it made about $11 billion last year from advertising sales on Android phones through its apps such as Maps, Search and Gmail, according to estimates by financial analyst Richard Windsor.
“A competitive mobile Internet sector is increasingly important for consumers and businesses in Europe,” European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in a statement.
“We believe that Google's behavior denies consumers a wider choice of mobile apps and services and stands in the way of innovation by other players,” she said.
The European Commission said about 80% of smart mobile devices in Europe and the world run on Android and that Google holds more than 90% of the market for general Internet searches on Android in the European Economic Area.
Google, which has 12 weeks to respond to the charges, said Android was a remarkable system based on open-source software and open innovation.
“We look forward to working with the European Commission to demonstrate that Android is good for competition and good for consumers,” Google's general counsel Kent Walker said in a blog.
He said any phone maker could load Google apps and rival products and that users had freedom of choice as well.
Complainant FairSearch said Google was hindering the development of versions that might lead to new operating systems able to compete with Android, despite launching it as an open source project.
The Commission said while Android was an open source system that could be used to develop new mobile operating systems — known as Android forks — Google required phone manufacturers to sign an agreement not to sell devices running on such forks if they wanted to pre-install Google apps.
The E.U. also charged Google with giving “significant financial incentives” to some of the world's largest smartphone makers to pre-install Google Search exclusively on devices.
Internet Explorer-browser maker Microsoft Corp. declined to comment. Firefox owner Mozilla, Apple Inc. which has the Safari browser, and Norway's Opera Software were not immediately available to comment.
Vodafone, BT Group's EE, Orange, Deutsche Telekom, KPN, Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics were not immediately available to comment. Huawei declined to comment.