Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Basis of California ruling

Reprints

The California Supreme Court's ruling in Wynona Harris v. City of Santa Monica involved a probationary bus driver who had had two preventable accidents, reported late for work twice and was terminated shortly after she told her supervisor she was pregnant.

“When a jury finds that unlawful discrimination was a substantial factor motivating a termination of employment, and when the employer proves it would have made the same decision absent such discrimination, a court may not award damages, back pay or an order of reinstatement,” the California high court ruled.

“But the employer does not escape liability,” the court said. In light of the state law's express purpose of deterring unlawful discrimination, plaintiffs may be awarded declaratory or injunctive relief and “reasonable” attorney fees and costs, the court ruled in remanding the case for further proceedings.