BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Copyright case in Oracle vs. Google goes to jury


SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)—Jurors began deliberating Monday about whether Google Inc. violated Oracle Corp.'s copyright on parts of the Java programming language, part of a high-stakes trial over smartphone technology with more than $1 billion in play.

Oracle is suing Google in federal court, claiming the search engine giant's Android mobile platform violated its patents and copyright to Java, and is seeking roughly $1 billion in copyright damages.

Two years ago, Oracle paid about $7.4 billion to buy Sun Microsystems, acquiring Java, the programming which is incorporated in Android smartphone technology, in the takeover.

In court on Monday, Oracle attorney Michael Jacobs said the parts of Java software that Google copied took much creative talent to compose.

"It's kind of like creating a symphony," Jacobs said during his closing argument.

But Google attorney Robert Van Nest said Sun's leadership had supported Android, and that Oracle decided against pursuing a smartphone of its own.

"It isn't until after they failed that they brought this lawsuit here," Van Nest said.

The jury will deliberate on copyright liability before moving on to hear evidence about patent infringement. U.S. District Judge William Alsup must also decide some of the copyright issues.

The trial, which began this month, is expected to last eight weeks.

Read Next

  • Oracle suit vs. Google at settlement impasse: U.S. judge

    SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)—Oracle Corp. and Google Inc. have reached an "irreconcilable impasse" in settlement negotiations in a high-profile intellectual property lawsuit and the companies' lawyers should prepare for trial, a U.S. magistrate judge ruled on Monday.