BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
TO THE EDITOR: Congratulations to Business Insurance on a nice, well-balanced editorial on the Bush proposal. I agree that, although it would equalize the tax treatment of employer-based and nongroup coverage, it wouldn't much change an employer's underlying reasons for offering--or not offering--health coverage.
One thing you missed, though, is that it also would equalize the tax treatment of premiums and out-of-pocket spending.
As your readers know, this is a constant trade-off. Lower premiums mean higher out-of-pocket expenses and vice versa. Bush would make it all tax-advantaged, not just the premium side.
It should encourage people to think more rationally about how much health care should be "covered" and how much should be paid directly.
Consumers for Health Care Choices