Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Katrina damages could tally up to $25 billion

Reprints

BOSTON—Hurricane Katrina could be the most costly natural catastrophe in U.S. history, causing insured damage of between $17 billion and $25 billion, Boston-based AIR Worldwide projected Tuesday afternoon.

AIR, a subsidiary of the Insurance Services Office Inc., had predicted Monday that the storm would cause between $12 billion and $26 billion in insured damage. That compares with Hurricane Andrew's 1992 total of about $21 billion of insured damage in inflation-adjusted dollars. Andrew is the costliest natural disaster to date.

AIR's update followed estimates by two other catastrophe modeling firms. Oakland, Calif.-based EQECAT Inc. estimated Monday afternoon that the hurricane would cause between $9 billion and $16 billion in insured property damage. And Newark, Calif.-based Risk Management Solutions Inc. on Monday afternoon estimated that the insured losses would fall in the range of $10 billion to $25 billion.

Meanwhile, reinsurers are likely to bear a larger share of the costs associated with Hurricane Katrina than they did with the four major hurricanes that hit Florida last year, Standard & Poor's Rating Services reported Tuesday.

That would be particularly true if total insured losses reach some of the higher estimates of Katrina's total insured losses, S&P said. But S&P further noted that primary insurers in Louisiana and Mississippi cannot rely on backup from state-run reinsurance programs such as Florida's, which paid primary insurers more than $3 billion to cover last year's losses.

Reinsurance is not the only difference in how Katrina will impact insurers compared to last year's storms, according to S&P.

For example, the Florida hurricanes' damage was heavily residential, but Katrina had a significant impact on commercial property, especially in the energy, chemicals and gaming industries.

S&P also noted that water damage might be a larger component of Katrina' losses, which could lead to coverage disputes.

The report—"Not a Case of History Repeating: Katrina a Very Different Monster Than Last Year's Florida Storms"—is available free of charge at www.standardandpoors.com.