BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
A Superior Court of Delaware judge ruled that a law firm employee injured while playing on his law firm’s softball team in 2017 is not entitled to workers compensation because the game was voluntary and failed to benefit the law firm’s business practices, among other reasons cited in the ruling issued Thursday.
The judge found that Delaware’s Industrial Accident Board, which initially awarded the man workers compensation, erred in concluding that he ruptured his Achilles tendon during the course and scope of his work for Wilmington-based Morris James L.L.P., according to documents in Morris James L.L.P. v. William Weller.
The judge found unproven the board’s contention “that softball participation was an ‘employment related’ activity… pressure was put on employees to play, and… Morris James told (the employee) and one player who was injured previously to submit workers compensation claims,” according to court records.
In its appeal, the firm argued that the contention that a prior claim had been made from a softball injury suffered by another employee “was due to its prior insurance carrier's errors, and Morris James should not be bound by those mistakes,” court records state.
The attorney for the injured worker was unable to be reached for comment.
(Reuters) — Massachusetts' top court on Friday opened the door for consumers to sue Merck & Co. Inc. and other makers of brand-name drugs over injuries blamed not on their own medications but on generic versions of their treatments made by other companies.