BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.
To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.
To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.
A federal appeals court has reinstated a Fair Labor Standards Act case filed against a janitorial firm that had required its workers to form corporate entities and become franchisees.
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver held in Wednesday’s ruling in R. Alexander Accosts, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Jani-King of Oklahoma Inc. that the evidence indicates the individuals involved can be considered employees under the FLSA.
Oklahoma City-based Jani-King is a janitorial company providing cleaning services in the Oklahoma City area that engages individuals, pairs or related individuals, or small corporate entities that are allegedly composed predominantly or entirely of single individuals or pairs of related individuals, to perform janitorial work on its behalf through franchise arrangements, according to the ruling.
The company recently began requiring individuals and pairs of related individuals, both those already affiliated with the firm and those who are new, to form corporate entities, which then became named parties to the franchise, said the ruling.
Following an investigation into its employment practices, the Secretary of Labor filed a complaint against the company alleging FLSA violations and seeking an injunction requiring it to keep the requisite FLSA employee records.
The U.S. District Court in Oklahoma City granted Jani-King’s motion to dismiss the case, which was unanimously overturned by a three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit.
The DOL’s amended complaint “alleged a series of facts to show that ... these individual Janitorial Cleaners are employees under the FLSA,” said the ruling.
“It is well settled that the economic realities of an individual’s working relationship with the employer — not necessarily the label or structure overlaying the relationship — determine whether the individual is an employee under the FLSA,” said the ruling.
“The complaint also alleges that Jani-King has violated the FLSA as to these employees by failing to comply with recordkeeping requirements. These allegations are sufficient to state a claim at this stage of the proceedings,” said the ruling, adding that “In so concluding we make no determination as to the merits of the Secretary’s case — we only hold that it survives” the initial motion to dismiss.
The case was remanded for further proceedings.
In July, a federal appeals court overturned a lower court ruling and held there is not enough evidence to establish that a relocation company was exempt from paying its workers overtime under an exception to the FLSA.
Several former and current Austrlian franchisees of U.S.-based 7-Eleven Inc. have filed a class action lawsuit against the corporation over the underpayment of thousands of workers, The West Australian reported. Stewart Levitt, a lawyer representing the franchisees, said that the lawsuit will seek damages from both 7-Eleven Stores and its lender Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. The convenience chain was forced to pay back millions of dollars to workers after it was revealed in 2015 that there had been rampant wage theft across hundreds of its stores.