Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

U.S. sues Barclays for mortgage securities fraud

Reprints

(Reuters) — The U.S. Department of Justice on Thursday sued Barclays P.L.C. for fraud in the sale of mortgage securities in the run-up to the financial crisis.

The British bank deceived investors about the quality of loans underlying tens of billions of dollars of mortgage securities between 2005 and 2007, according to the lawsuit, which was filed in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, New York.

Loans had been made to borrowers with no ability to repay and were based on inflated home appraisals, the complaint said.

Barclays did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The bank's U.S.-traded shares were down 1.7% at $11.08 shortly before the close of the market.

Barclays is among a number of European banks that have been under investigation for misconduct in the sale of mortgage securities, which contributed to the 2008 financial crisis.

Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse are in negotiations over similar claims, sources have told Reuters.

Major U.S. banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America have already paid tens of billions of dollars to settle with U.S. authorities over their pooling and sale of the securities.

According to the lawsuit against Barclays, more than half the underlying loans in $31 billion worth of mortgage loans pooled into 36 deals defaulted.

 

 

Read Next

  • Wells Fargo beats appeal over voided mortgage late fees verdict

    (Reuters) — A federal appeals court on Friday rejected a bid to revive a $54.8 million jury verdict against Wells Fargo & Co, saying the trial judge had authority to take the “drastic step” of decertifying the class action after the award was made.