BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Jury awards $3 million in damages over Rolling Stone rape story

Jury awards $3 million in damages over Rolling Stone rape story

(Reuters) -- A federal court jury awarded $3 million in damages on Monday to a University of Virginia administrator that was found last week to have been defamed by Rolling Stone magazine’s now-retracted story about a gang rape.

The 10-person U.S. District Court jury in Charlottesville, Virginia, determined that the writer of the article, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, should pay $2 million in damages and the magazine $1 million to the administrator, Nicole Eramo.

Ms. Eramo, the former associate dean of students at the university, had sought at least $7.5 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages in the high-profile case.

“With careful consideration of the facts in evidence for determining damages, the jury made its determination. We were proud to execute our civic duty,” said jury forewoman Deborah Parmelee, reading from a brief statement from the jury after the hearing on Monday, according to the New York Times.

Samuel Bayard, an attorney for Rolling Stone, declined to comment when reached by phone following the verdict on Monday night. The magazine apologized to Ms. Eramo after last week’s verdict.

Following a three-week trial, the jurors on Friday found Rolling Stone, owner Wenner Media and Erdely liable for actual malice against Ms. Eramo in the magazine’s November 2014 story “A Rape on Campus.”

The magazine reported that a female student identified only as “Jackie” was raped at a university fraternity in 2012. The story sparked a national debate about sexual assault at U.S. colleges and resonated with many who saw it as a battle cry against sexual violence on campuses.

Rolling Stone admitted that it never sought comment from the seven men accused of the alleged rape and retracted the story in April 2015. An outside review found the magazine had failed to follow basic journalistic safeguards in an embarrassing blow to the pop culture publication, founded by Jann Wenner in 1967.

Ms. Eramo accused the magazine of portraying her as the story’s villain and as being focused on hushing up sexual assault reports. She has claimed damages from the story including harm to her reputation, embarrassment, emotional distress and humiliation.

Ms. Eramo now works in an administrative role at the almost 200-year-old university, which was founded by Thomas Jefferson and has long ranked as one of the top public universities in the United States.

Campus sexual assault remains a major concern, with some reports estimating that one in five female students will be a victim.




Read Next

  • Virginia fraternity chapter to sue 'reckless' Rolling Stone

    (Reuters) — The University of Virginia fraternity chapter at the center of Rolling Stone magazine's retracted article “A Rape on Campus” said on Monday that it planned to sue the magazine for what it called “reckless” reporting that hurt its reputation.