BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Supreme Court rules against Tyson Foods in class action case


(Reuters) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday handed a loss to Tyson Foods Inc. over the company’s challenge to an almost $5.8 million class action judgment in a case won by workers at an Iowa pork-processing facility who contend they were underpaid.

The court, in a 6-2 ruling, upheld an appeals court ruling in favor of the workers. It was one of three closely watched class action cases to come before the court during its current term, with business interests urging the justices to rein in such litigation.

The court was considering Tyson’s objection to the use of statistics to determine liability and damages. Critics in the business community have described such use of statistics as “trial by formula” that violates defendants’ due process rights, instead of assessing each claim individually for the more than 3,000 current and former employees who are suing.

The narrow ruling, written by conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy, turned in part on a 1946 Supreme Court precedent that said plaintiffs can rely on averages in such situations to determine claims under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The court did not address a broader question of whether a class action lawsuit should move forward if the group of plaintiffs includes people who were not injured.

Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.

Workers at the meat-processing facility, which employs around 1,300 people, sued in 2007, claiming they were entitled to overtime pay and damages because they were not paid for time spent putting on and taking off protective equipment and walking to work stations.

The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs following a trial in a federal district court in Iowa in 2011. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judgment in 2014.

Read Next