BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Google demands movie studios comply with subpoenas


(Reuters) — Google Inc. has asked a federal judge to require three major movie studios to comply with subpoenas it believes may help show they conspired with Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood as he investigated the Internet search company.

In a request made public on Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, Google said Viacom Inc., Twenty-First Century Fox Inc. and Comcast Corp.'s NBCUniversal "have produced nothing" in response to the March 12 subpoenas, and cannot claim the requested material is irrelevant or privileged.

Google sued Mr. Hood, a longtime critic, last Dec. 19 in Mississippi to block his probe of whether it should be held civilly or criminally responsible for encouraging sales of objectionable materials, such as illegal drugs and pornography, through its search engine and YouTube video-sharing website.

As part of that case, the Mountain View, California-based company accused Mr. Hood of effectively being a pawn for the Motion Picture Association of America, whose members it said "have spent years pursuing an anti-Google agenda" as the group tries to halt the distribution of pirated videos on the Internet.

Viacom, Twenty-First Century Fox and NBCUniversal are among the MPAA's six members.

The subpoenas issued in connection with the Mississippi case seek communications with Mr. Hood, communications with other state attorneys general about Google and information about studios' campaign donations to Mr. Hood and the Democratic Attorneys General Association. Mr. Hood is a Democrat.

"Google subpoenaed the studios for information about behind-the-scenes maneuvering that fomented AG Hood's violations of Google's constitutional and federal rights," the company said in a court filing. "Given the narrow window afforded for discovery in this case, Google can wait no longer."

Nathaniel Brown, a spokesman for Twenty-First Century Fox, declined to comment. Viacom, NBCUniversal and the MPAA did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Mr. Hood's office had no immediate comment.

Google's lawsuit against Mr. Hood is pending in federal court in Jackson, Mississippi.

Without ruling on the merits, U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate in Jackson on March 27 found a "substantial likelihood" that Mr. Hood violated Google's First Amendment rights by regulating the company's speech based on its content, and retaliated for that speech by having issued a 79-page subpoena to Google in October.

The case is Google Inc. v. Twenty-First Century Fox Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 15-mc-00150. The Mississippi case is Google Inc. v. Hood, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi, No. 14-00981.

Read Next