BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Wal-Mart raises health care costs, cuts benefits for some part-timers

Wal-Mart raises health care costs, cuts benefits for some part-timers

(Reuters) — Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the biggest U.S. private-sector employer, said on Tuesday that its 1.3 million workers would have to pay more for health care and it would end benefits for some part-time staff in a move that could prompt other companies to follow suit.

The world's largest retailer said it would raise health insurance premiums for its entire U.S. workforce beginning in January. In addition, Wal-Mart will end coverage for employees who work fewer than 30 hours a week, a change that will impact 2% of its U.S. workers, or about 30,000 people.

The move comes as U.S. companies brace for a January 2015 deadline under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Starting then, companies with 100 or more employees will have to offer health insurance to those working at least 30 hours a week, a mandate that has drawn criticism from some companies worried about higher costs.

Wal-Mart, which announced the change in a blog post on Tuesday, had cited health care expenses as a problem in August, when it cut its 2014 profit forecast. It said more people than expected had enrolled in its plans and its annual forecast for health care costs had risen by 50%.

"Like every company, Wal-Mart continues to face rising health care costs," Sally Welborn, senior vice president of global benefits, wrote in the blog post on the company's website. "This year, the expenses were significant and led us to make some tough decisions as we begin our annual enrollment."

Wal-Mart said the biweekly premiums for its most popular and lowest-cost employee-only plans will rise by $3.50 to $21.90, which represents a 19% increase. Wal-Mart workers earn on average $12.92 an hour.

The decision to reduce coverage came a week before the company's chief executive, Doug McMillon, is due to face fund managers and analysts at an annual meeting for the investment community. Wal-Mart has been struggling to boost profits, with U.S. same-store sales flat or declining for the last six quarters.

Wal-Mart said the move would bring it in line with many of its competitors. Target Corp. and The Home Depot Inc. recently announced cuts to benefits in light of the Affordable Care Act.

According to consulting firm Mercer L.L.C., 62% of large retailers did not offer health care benefits to part-time workers as of 2013, a comparatively high rate that reflects low wages and high turnover in the industry. That figure drops to 37% for companies overall.

Brian Yarbrough, an analyst at Edward Jones, said the decision by Wal-Mart could force other retailers to rethink what benefits they provide.

All retailers are "trying to cut expenses, to keep things lean," Mr. Yarbrough said. "At some point, you start looking across the board, and this is probably the next place to start looking at cuts."

Some big retailers, such as coffee chain Starbucks Corp. and Costco Wholesale Corp. offer health coverage to part-time employees.

Critics of Wal-Mart's decision said it would primarily hurt lower-income workers, many of whom are being left behind in the economic recovery.

The jobless rate fell to a six-year low of 5.9% in September, according to the U.S. Labor Department. But that number would be much higher if it included the 7.1 million Americans who are working part time but say they need full time jobs.

"Taking away access to health care, even though many of my co-workers couldn't afford it anyway, is just another example of Walmart manipulating the system to keep workers like me in a state of financial crisis," Nancy Reynolds, a cashier at a Wal-Mart in Florida and member of Our Walmart, a group pushing for better wages and benefits, said in an email from the group.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said it was not unusual to hear reports of large companies reducing or eliminating health care benefits. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, he said the difference now is that workers "have a legitimate alternative where they can acquire high-quality, affordable health care, and that is through the marketplaces that were constructed by the Affordable Care Act."

Others also noted a potential silver lining for some employees who could now apply for government subsidies on the public exchanges for which they would not have been eligible if covered by a corporate plan.

"There is another way employees can get coverage, and for some employees it actually may be a good thing because they'll get a subsidy," said Beth Umland, research director for health and benefits at Mercer.

Wal-Mart's Ms. Welborn said on a conference call that the company had not yet figured out how much it would save by cutting benefits. The company said in August it expected to spend $500 million on U.S. health care this year, up from its estimate of $330 million just a few months earlier.

Of Wal-Mart's 1.3 million U.S. employees, the company said 1.2 million currently elect to be covered under the company's health insurance plans.

The company said it was changing some eligibility terms for part-time employees working more than 30 hours a week but did not provide details.

Wal-Mart shares ended down 5 cents at $77.30 in New York, on a day when the market slumped broadly.

Read Next