Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

American Benefits Council asks Washington for simplified retirement approach

Reprints
American Benefits Council asks Washington for simplified retirement approach

Employers need more flexibility and simplicity in providing retirement and other benefits, officials with the American Benefits Council said Tuesday as they unveiled a strategic plan for where employee benefits should be in 2020.

“The era of one-size-fits-all approaches to health and retirement benefits policy is over,” said Janet Boyd, director of government relations, tax and benefits for Dow Chemical Co. and chairwoman of the council's board of directors.

To help improve retirement readiness, the council called for higher contribution limits and lowering the eligibility age to 45 for “catch-up” contributions to defined contribution plans. They also recommend higher default contribution and escalation rates, and a good-faith presumption that would allow employers to use new technology to communicate benefit information without having to wait for regulatory changes.

A key part of the plan is creating “a new regulatory paradigm” that targets employers with poor performance related to benefit regulations, “rather than imposing all the burdens on everyone in the system,” said council President James A. Klein, who called for exceptions for large employers instead of ones currently available for small employers.

“We have to adopt an exceptions-based approach,” said Michael Kiely, senior vice president for federal government affairs for United Parcel Service Inc. “We have to spend more time and energy on simplifying all the rules and regulations.”

Five years from now, council leaders expect more integration of health and financial well-being objectives among employers, and more pressure on benefit plan design from global competitiveness.

Hazel Bradford writes for Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Business Insurance.

Read Next

  • Q&A: Brian Marcotte, National Business Group on Health

    Brian Marcotte is president and chief executive officer of the National Business Group on Health in Washington. Mr. Marcotte joined the NBGH, which helps its members control health care costs, improve patient safety and quality of care, earlier this year after more than two decades at Honeywell International Inc., where he was vice president of benefits and compensation. In an interview with Jerry Geisel, editor-at-large, Mr. Marcotte discusses from a large employer perspective the pros and cons of the health care reform law.