Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Dechert lawyer allegedly hid hacked emails’ origin

Reprints
Hacked

(Reuters) — A senior attorney at the law firm Dechert covered up the origin of a cache of hacked emails used to win a lawsuit against an Iranian-American aviation tycoon, a former colleague said in legal papers filed last week.

The tycoon, Farhad Azima, is suing Dechert over allegations that one of the firm's London-based partners — Neil Gerrard, who has since retired from the firm — organized the theft of his emails and leaked them to the web ahead of a British lawsuit filed in 2016.

Now an affidavit by British private investigator Stuart Page has offered support for Mr. Azima's case, alleging that Mr. Gerrard helped concoct a bogus story that would explain how he got a copy of the stolen data.

Dechert declined to comment. Representatives for Mr. Gerrard, who had previously denied wrongdoing, did not return emails. Lawyers for Mr. Page did not respond to messages.

Mr. Page's affidavit could open a new window into how hackers are used to win high-stakes litigation.

A Reuters investigation has previously revealed the existence of a group of India-based hackers that worked with Western private eyes to hack parties involved in lawsuits. Mr. Azima was among the hackers' targets.

It was in 2016, shortly after he was targeted by the hackers, that Mr. Azima was sued by one of Dechert's clients, the Emirates-based Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority.

The British judge who tried that case in 2020 found that the leaked emails showed Mr. Azima had engaged in “seriously fraudulent conduct” in his dealings with RAKIA and ordered him to pay $4.2 million in compensation to the fund.

Mr. Azima has fought to throw the ruling out on the grounds that the emails were stolen by the opposing party. He recently was granted a retrial in Britain, which is due to begin next year.