Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Travelers beats profit estimates on strong investment returns

Reprints
Travelers

(Reuters) — Property/casualty insurer Travelers Cos. Inc. reported a drop in third-quarter profit on Tuesday that still beat estimates, as higher investment returns mainly from its non-fixed-income portfolio softened the blow from a jump in catastrophe losses.

Total revenue rose 6% to $8.81 billion.

The company, a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index, is seen as the bellwether for the insurance sector and typically reports ahead of its peers.

The company reported core income of $655 million, or $2.60 per share, for the three months ended Sept. 30, while analysts had expected $1.67 per share, according to Refinitiv IBES data.

In the year-earlier period, the New York-based insurer had reported a profit of $798 million, or $3.12 per share.

The company reported pre-tax net investment income of $771 million, up 15% from the year-earlier period. Low interest rates and hot capital markets in the U.S. helped the insurer yield higher returns from its non-fixed-income investments, which offset a weak performance from its fixed-income investments.

Flash flooding and heavy rains due to Hurricane Ida in late August caused damage to property and disrupted businesses. These losses are expected to take a big chunk out of insurers' earnings, with catastrophe risk modeling company Risk Management Solutions Inc. estimating U.S. insurers could lose between $31 billion and $44 billion.

Travelers' catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, came in at $501 million, compared with $397 million in the year-earlier period.

The company reported a combined ratio of 98.6% for the quarter, compared with 94.9% a year earlier. A ratio below 100% means the insurer earned more in premiums than it paid out in claims.

 

 

 

Read Next