Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Musk begins testifying in defense of Tesla’s deal for SolarCity

Reprints
Elon Musk

(Reuters) — Elon Musk took the stand Monday to defend Tesla Inc.’s 2016 acquisition of SolarCity against a lawsuit by shareholders seeking to recoup the $2.6 billion the company paid for the ailing solar panel maker.

“Pretoria, South Africa,” Mr. Musk said, responding to the first question of where he was born.

Musk's testimony kicks off a two-week trial in Wilmington, Delaware, before Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights, who will decide whether the SolarCity deal was fair to Tesla stockholders.

The lawsuit by union pension funds and asset managers alleges the celebrity CEO strong-armed Tesla's board to buy SolarCity, just as it was about to run out of cash. Mr. Musk owned a 22% stake in SolarCity, which was founded by his cousins.

Shareholders asked the court to order Mr. Musk, one of the world's richest people, to repay to Tesla what it spent on the deal, which would represent one of the largest judgments ever against an individual. However, even if the judge finds the deal was unfair, he could award a much lower amount of damages.

Mr. Musk has argued the deal was fair and that it was negotiated by the Tesla board free of his influence and approved by fully informed stockholders.

He touted the deal at the time as central to his “Master Plan, Part Deux,” which aims to reshape transportation by using sustainable energy to power fleets of self-driving electric vehicles.

Legal experts said the judge will be looking for evidence that Mr. Musk threatened board members or that directors felt they could not stand up to him.

The shareholders’ lawsuit accuses Mr. Musk of dominating deal discussions, pushing Tesla to pay more for SolarCity and misleading shareholders about the deteriorating financial health of the solar panel maker.

Central to the case will be allegations that Mr. Musk, who had a 22% stake in Tesla at the time of the deal, was nonetheless a controlling shareholder.

“It would be a surprise to most people if the court were to come out and say that he doesn't control here,” said Brian Quinn, a professor at Boston College Law School. “Because he certainly acts like he does.”

Mr. Musk is expected to be questioned by shareholder attorney Randy Baron, whom Mr. Musk called “reprehensible” at a testy 2019 deposition during which he also accused Mr. Baron of attacking sustainable energy, according to a transcript.

When Mr. Baron asked if Mr. Musk bailed out SolarCity, Mr. Musk replied: “You are a shameful person.”

Tesla’s directors settled allegations from the same lawsuit last year for $60 million, paid by insurance, without admitting fault.

Vice Chancellor Slights will likely take months before he issues a ruling.

 

 

 

Read Next

  • Tesla, Musk face shareholder lawsuit over going-private tweet

    (Reuters) A federal judge said Tesla Inc. and Chief Executive Elon Musk must face a lawsuit claiming they misled shareholders when Mr. Musk tweeted that he had secured funding to take his electric car company private in a $72 billion transaction.