Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Trump company settles lawsuit over disputed golf club deposits

Reprints
Trump company settles lawsuit over disputed golf club deposits

(Reuters) — A Florida golf club owned by President Donald Trump agreed on Friday to pay $5.45 million to settle claims by former members that it wrongfully refused to refund their deposits when they wanted to resign.

The payout is more than 94% of the $5.77 million that U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra, who must approve the settlement, last February had ordered the Trump National Golf Club in Jupiter, Florida, to pay.

Lawyers for the golf club and the Trump Organization did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The club had been scheduled to argue its appeal of Judge Marra’s ruling in May, court records show.

“In our view, the class prevailed,” Brad Edwards, a lawyer for the former club members, said in an email.

The lawsuit began after President Trump changed membership rules for the club, which he had acquired from Ritz-Carlton in November 2012.

Under the old rules, members who wanted to resign could keep playing golf until their replacements were found.

But President Trump declared in a letter that “as the owner of the club” he did not want them using the club, and “you’re out.”

Judge Marra, in his February 2017 ruling, said this served to cancel the memberships, justifying a return of $4.85 million of deposits to 65 members, plus interest.

In court papers on Friday, the plaintiffs’ lawyers said the former members would recoup about 71% of their deposits, after deducting legal fees and expenses.

The lawyers called the settlement “fundamentally fair, reasonable, and adequate.”

The case is Hirsch et al. v. Jupiter Golf Club L.L.C. et al., U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, No. 13-80456.

 

 

Read Next