Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Catastrophe tests show capital risks to London insurers

Reprints
Catastrophe tests show capital risks to London insurers

(Reuters) — A major $200 billion loss from a combination of a cyber attack, U.S. hurricane and the failure of a reinsurer could strip insurers of up to 120% of their net capital base, tests of insurers in London showed.

However, capital-raising or asset sales meant losses would not put the insurers out of business, according to the results of the tests published on Tuesday.

Nine insurers and reinsurers staged two weeks of catastrophe simulations in London last November, dealing with a cyber attack on power grids across 15 U.S. states, a 16% slide in global stocks, a Category 5 hurricane over Miami and the failure of a major reinsurer.

The simulation was for insurance losses nearly 10 times greater than those suffered during the 9/11 terror attacks in the United States in 2001, and double those seen during the combination of hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in 2005.

The tests, led by Robert Childs, chairman of insurer Hiscox Ltd., were observed by the Prudential Regulation Authority, the U.K. finance ministry and ratings agencies.

Mr. Childs said the 9/11 attacks were the last to be a market-turning event for insurers in terms of their shock value.

The aim of the tests was to "have a really nasty loss and see who will pay for it and how we will deal with it ... we want to be ready," Mr. Childs said.

Insurers in the tests lost between 30% and 120% of their capital, and sought replacement capital from their parent company or bond or equity markets.

Chris Moulder, director for general insurance at the Prudential Regulation Authority, said access to capital or reinsurance might not be as easy as insurers think in the event of a genuine catastrophe.

Mr. Moulder added it was important for firms "to consider what they might do if the level of uncertainty is high, or the actions being taken across the market as a whole affect an individual firm's ability to act in the way it might have originally planned."

Other participants in the tests included Lloyd's of London and insurers RSA and XL Catlin, and brokers Aon P.L.C. and Willis Towers Watson P.L. C. Consultants McKinsey designed the tests. 

Read Next

  • Natural catastrophe losses of $520 billion underline importance of disaster risk finance

    A report by the World Bank and the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery has said that the $520 billion in losses from natural catastrophes every year underline the importance of disaster risk finance and improved disaster resilience, Artemis.bm reported. The figure highlights the importance of integrating disaster risk financing and risk transfer, as well as insurance, reinsurance and capital markets capacity, into the disaster resilience plans of countries around the world. Nations can save $100 billion a year by improving resilience and preparedness against natural disasters, the report said.