Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Employee class decertified on inadequate analysis

Reprints
Employee class decertified on inadequate analysis

A federal appeals court has decertified a class of employees of a golf management firm, stating the lower district court had failed to conduct a proper analysis.

Dallas-based Century Golf Partners Management L.P. is being charged with violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and New York labor law at New York catering facilities operated by the firm, according to Tuesday’s ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans in Jillian Izzio et al. v. Century Golf Partners Management L.P., Anthony Metzger.

It is one of several cases filed against Century Golf, according to the ruling. The U.S. District Court in Dallas certified a class in the case and approved a settlement. An objection was filed to the class certification, including by a plaintiff who has filed separate litigation against the firm, according to court papers.

The U.S. Supreme Court requires district courts to analyze four prerequisites for class certification: numerosity, commonality, typicality and adequacy of representation, said a unanimous three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit.

Appellants “argue that class certification was improper because the district court did not conduct an adequate analysis,” said the ruling. They contend the district court “conducted no analysis, much less a rigorous analysis,” it said.

“Having reviewed the record and the briefs, we agree with appellants,” said the panel in vacating the class certification order and remanding the case.

Read Next

  • Title VII bars sexual orientation bias, federal judge rules

    A federal court has held that sexual orientation discrimination is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in what the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission describes as an historic ruling.