Printed from BusinessInsurance.com

Lawsuit accuses Target of not paying overtime to some warehouse workers

Posted On: Mar. 30, 2016 12:00 AM CST

(Reuters) — Target Corp. has been accused in a lawsuit of failing to pay overtime to workers with low-level management responsibilities at its warehouses in New York state.

The lawsuit, which seeks class action status, accuses the retailer of violating state labor law by misclassifying “operations group leaders” as exempt from overtime requirements and not paying them for all hours worked.

Target was sued six months after the Obama administration proposed making nearly 5 million more U.S. workers eligible for overtime pay.

That proposal, which is being reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget, is widely expected to narrow an exemption for white-collar workers from overtime pay protections based on the percentage of time they spend on management tasks.

Target “controls very carefully what the group leaders do such that they are not left with meaningful executive authority that would satisfy exemption under the law,” Jahan Sagafi, a lawyer for the named plaintiff, Robert LaPointe Jr, told Reuters.

A Target spokeswoman said Target's distribution center group leaders are properly classified as exempt, salaried team members and said these department leaders hire, manage and lead teams of up to 50 people.

“They are competitively compensated and rewarded for their performance. We dispute the allegations in the suit,” she said.

Mr. Sagafi said the lawsuit may expand to cover Target's activity in other states.

He did not say how many potential plaintiffs might be covered, but the complaint said more than 40 group leaders in New York state might be covered.

Target is overhauling its supply chain infrastructure. Earlier this month, the retailer said it will invest $2 billion to $2.5 billion annually starting in 2017, mainly to upgrade its supply network and technology infrastructure, as it races to reduce stock shortages and pushes for online growth.

The lawsuit, which was not widely reported, was filed in December in a New York state court, and later moved to federal court.