Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Supreme Court looks to weigh compromise on contraceptives

Reprints
Supreme Court looks to weigh compromise on contraceptives

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday laid out a possible compromise involving the Affordable Care Act’s prescription contraceptive coverage mandate.

In a one-and-one-half page order, the justices asked religious nonprofit organizations that object to any involvement with the ACA mandate and government agencies defending the law to provide suggestions to allow employees to obtain contraceptives but “not require any involvement of petitioners,” meaning the religious organizations.

The organizations sued to challenge the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services rules requiring them to notify their insurers or third-party administrators of their objections to providing coverage, with the insurers or TPAs then providing the coverage.

The nonprofits, which made their arguments orally earlier this month, said that required them to be complicit in providing contraceptives to their employees — an act they believe is in violation of their faith.

“The parties should consider a situation in which petitioners would contract to provide health insurance for their employees, and in the course of obtaining such coverage inform their insurance company that they do not want their health plan to include contraceptive coverage of the type to which they object on religious grounds,” the high court said in its order.

Under that approach, the religious organizations would not have to provide a separate notice to their insurers, while the insurers would notify the organizations’ employees that the insurers would provide cost-free coverage.

The Supreme Court asked for comments to be submitted by April 13, with reply briefs due April 20.

Read Next

  • Supreme Court rejects new challenge to health care reform law

    (Reuters) — The U.S. Supreme Court, which delivered major rulings in 2012 and 2015 preserving President Barack Obama's signature health care law, on Tuesday declined to take up a new, long-shot challenge to the Affordable Care Act brought by an Iowa artist.