Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Stricter filing rules limit number of M&A lawsuit venues

Reprints

Litigation challenging merger and acquisition activity is being filed in fewer courts, says a report released Wednesday.

A recent Delaware ruling provides that firms domiciled in the state, which account for more than half of publicly held companies nationwide, may include a requirement in their bylaws that derivative litigation be filed in a particular jurisdiction.

Although 93% of M&A deals valued at more than $100 million were litigated, virtually unchanged from 94% in 2013, 60% of 2014 deals were filed in only one jurisdiction, according to “Shareholder Litigation Involving Acquisitions of Public Companies, Review of 2014 M&A Litigation,” issued by Boston-based Cornerstone Research Inc.

Last year's Cornerstone report said that in 2013, 62% of the deals were litigated in more than one court, with the biggest percentage, 54%, filed in two courts.

Plaintiff attorneys filed 608 lawsuits challenging M&A deals announced in 2014 and valued at more than $100 million, virtually unchanged from 612 in 2013, according to Cornerstone.

Read Next