Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

COBRA champion Pete Stark loses in re-election bid

Reprints
COBRA champion Pete Stark loses in re-election bid

Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., the co-author of the original COBRA health care legislation, was defeated Tuesday in his bid for a 21st term in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Stark, 80, was defeated by Eric Swalwell, a 31-year-old local prosecutor, in the race to represent a redrawn California congressional district.

In the employee benefits realm, Rep. Stark was best known as the lawmaker who in the mid-1980s — along with Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif. — introduced legislation to require employers to extend group health care coverage to employees after they terminated employment and to their dependents in death, divorce and marital separation situations.

That free-standing bill later was attached to a broader bill — the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act — that lawmakers approved in 1986. Since its passage, COBRA has enabled millions of employees and their dependents to retain coverage by paying a premium equal to 102% of the group rate.

Rep. Stark, a long-serving member of the House Ways and Means Committee and onetime chairman of its health subcommittee, was an outspoken critic of consumer-driven health care plans. In 2008, he described health savings accounts, which are linked to CDHPs, as a way to “simply shift costs to consumers, not control costs.” Those who opt for the arrangements tend to be the “healthy, wealthy,” which can result in a “devastating” shift of costs to lower-income, less healthy employees who enroll in other health care plans, he said.

He could be outspoken, some said, to a fault. In 2003, he disrupted a House and Means Committee vote on pension issues when he called a fellow panel member a “fruitcake.”