Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Work inactivity contributed to at-home employee's death: N.J. court

Reprints

TRENTON, N.J.—An obese AT&T manager who died of a blood clot after sitting at her work computer for long hours is entitled to workers compensation survivor benefits, a New Jersey court has ruled.

The case of James P. Renner vs. AT&T stems from the death of 25-year-old Cathleen Renner, who worked from home and “worked all hours of the day and night” to meet deadlines imposed by her employer, court records state.

In 2007, she called 911 because she could not breathe and was pronounced dead on arrival at a hospital.

Medical experts differed

A medical expert for Mr. Renner said that sitting for an extended period probably led to the formation of blood clots and contributed to Ms. Renner’s death, although he acknowledged she had other risk factors, such as obesity.

Meanwhile, a medical expert for the defense said that a combination of risk factors contributed her pulmonary embolism, but he also admitted that it would have been less likely for her to suffer from a pulmonary embolism had she not worked that day, according to court records.

A workers comp judge concluded the claim was compensable and found that Ms. Renner’s “work inactivity was greater than her nonwork inactivity” and determined that her work inactivity caused the pulmonary embolism.

AT&T appealed and the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division said it had to determine whether the woman’s lack of movement at work “was more severe than her lack of movement in her daily living, and whether the inactivity at work caused her pulmonary embolism in a material way.”

The court ruled Monday that sufficient, credible evidence to support the finding that prolonged inactivity while working caused the pulmonary embolism by a material degree.