Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Markel wins coverage dispute over concert shooting death by security guard

Reprints

A Markel Corp. unit is not obligated to defend or indemnify a security company whose security guard shot a concertgoer to death under an exclusion in the policyholder’s liability policy, says a federal appeals court in affirming a lower court ruling.

Norman, Oklahoma-based Event Security L.L.C. was hired to provide private security for a July 2013 concert at the Farmer’s Market in Oklahoma City, according to Monday’s ruling by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver in Event Security L.L.C., and Charlesetta Redd v. Essex Insurance Co.

The company hired Paul Galyon, an Oklahoma City police officer, to work off-duty as a security officer at the event. According to the ruling, Brian Simms Jr. was sleeping in a friend’s car in the parking lot when Mr. Galyon and another off-duty police officer working as a security officer approached him.

Shortly after initiating contact, Mr. Galyon opened fire and shot Mr. Simms 12 times, killing him. Both men said later Mr. Simms “had a gun on his lap or in his waistband.”

Event Security and Ms. Redd, on behalf of Mr. Simms’ estate, filed suit against Essex, a unit of Glens Allen, Virginia-based Markel Corp., seeking indemnification the case.

The District Court ruled against the plaintiffs, which a three-judge appeals court panel unanimously upheld.

“Redd’s claims against Security were for its alleged negligence and gross negligence in failing to properly train or supervise Galyon — claims excluded under the liability policy,” said the ruling, in affirming the lower court’s decision.

The decision also affirmed Essex had no duty to provide a defense against any lawsuit seeing damages for bodily injury under the firm’s policy.

 

Read Next

  • Liberty Mutual unit not obligated to pay informal SEC probe costs

    A Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. unit is not obligated under its directors and officers liability policy to pay more than $3 million spent by a sports nutrition company in connection with an informal U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, says a federal appeals court in upholding a lower court ruling.