Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Judge approves $415 million settlement in tech worker lawsuit

Reprints

(Reuters) — A U.S. judge on Wednesday granted final approval to a $415 million settlement that ends a high-profile lawsuit in which workers accused Apple Inc., Google Inc. and two other Silicon Valley companies of conspiring to hold down salaries.

The plaintiffs alleged that Apple, Google, Intel Corp. and Adobe Systems Inc. agreed to avoid poaching each other's employees, thus limiting job mobility and, as a result, keeping a lid on salaries.

In a ruling on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California, found the deal was fair to the thousands of plaintiff workers in the class action.

Attorneys representing those workers had asked for about $81 million in fees. However, Judge Koh decided such an award would be an inappropriate "windfall" for the lawyers, and awarded about $40 million instead.

The antitrust class action lawsuit was filed in 2011. It has been closely watched because of the possibility that big damages might be awarded and for the opportunity to peek into the world of some elite U.S. tech firms.

The case was based largely on emails in which Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and some of their rivals detailed plans to avoid poaching each other's prized engineers.

The case is In Re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California 11-cv-2509.

Read Next

  • Apple, Google appeal rejection of $325M hiring settlement

    (Reuters) — Four technology companies including Apple and Google blasted a U.S. judge for rejecting a proposed $324.5 million settlement over hiring practices in Silicon Valley and asked an appeals court to intervene, according to a court filing.